Acres of new impervious surface area in residential zones per net new housing units built.
A lower value in this indicator suggests that new housing did not cause a substantial increase in new impervious surfaces.
Accommodating growth in urban areas and promoting Smart Growth principles is a key strategy for the recovery of the Puget Sound ecosystem. Promoting infill development can help protect forest lands, open spaces, farms, and wetlands. Dense infill development, such as new apartment buildings and other multi-unit housing, is an effective way to support population growth while protecting sensitive habitats[i].
Jurisdictions are required under the Washington Growth Management Act to protect critical environmental areas and conserve natural resource areas like farms and forests[ii].
The 2022-2026 Action Agenda for Puget Sound and the related Land Development and Cover Implementation Strategy outline specific actions to protect natural areas and promote infill development.
This Progress Indicator is one way to assess progress promoting infill development.
[i]. Puget Sound Regional Council (2020). Infill Development, Housing Innovations Program, Puget Sound Regional Council. https://www.psrc.org/media/2038.
[ii]. Washington Administrative Code (2023). Minimum Guidelines to Classify Agriculture, Forest, Mineral Lands, and Critical Areas, title 365, chapter 190, section 020. WAC 365-190-020.
The following section describes observations of the baseline period. Due to data availability, we are not yet able to evaluate change over time and thus apply the “No Trend” designation. As we collect more information on this indicator, we will update this report to characterize its trend.
Results were similar in most counties, with a few outliers.
Jurisdictions vary widely, though larger cities tended to score lower than suburban and rural areas.
Small Area Estimates program, Office of Financial Management, State of Washington.
High Resolution Change Detection, Department of Fish and Wildlife, State of Washington.
Housing units estimates for 2011 and 2017, Washington Office of Financial Management’s Small Area Estimates program.
Impervious surface change polygons for 2011 and 2017, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife’s High Resolution Change Detection program.
GIS data about general land use, including areas zoned to allow residential, 2012. Puget Sound Mapping Project.
Jurisdiction boundaries (cities, towns, urban growth areas, and counties), 2017. Washington Office of Financial Management.
This Progress Indicator relies on aerial imagery data from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) High Resolution Change Detection (HRCD) program to evaluate impervious surface area gains over time.
The indicator is calculated between 2011 and 2017. It is calculated by summarizing the total gain in impervious surface area in 2011 and 2017 in each jurisdiction and dividing that value by the estimated net new housing units for 2011 and 2017 in that jurisdiction. Due to data availability, results cannot be broken out by year from 2011 to 2017.
The indicator is calculated for every city, town, unincorporated UGAs, and rural areas. Results can be rolled up to the county or regional scale.
Baseline period: change between 2011 and 2017.
We do not currently have enough data to evaluate trends in this indicator. We thus apply the “No Trend” designation. As we collect more information on this indicator, we will compare new data to the baseline reporting period (2011-2017) and evaluate the trend of the indicator.
Limitations
This Progress Indicator helps assess progress minimizing new impervious surface areas with new housing development. But it has limitations:
The indicator is not a direct measure of infill development.
There is local variation in zoning practices that impacts the ability to identify areas that allow for residential growth.
Zoning classes used by this indicator represent a simplified picture of zoning practices.
Not all impervious surfaces have the same environmental impacts.
The indicator does not specify where impervious surface gain is occurring in relation to key natural areas.
View a detailed report of the methods used to calculate this Progress Indicator here.
Impervious surface area: the area of man-made structures (pavement, sidewalks, roofs, driveways, parking lots) that are covered by water-resistant materials like asphalt, concrete, brick, etc.[i]
Infill development: New construction built within established urban areas. In many cases, infill development is built in locations that are already impervious, such as through redevelopment of a strip mall or parking lot. Infill development typically results in much more limited expansion of impervious surface area because much of the necessary infrastructure (roads, parking lots, etc.) already exists nearby.
Urban Growth Area (UGA): Areas designated by counties within which urban growth shall be encouraged and outside of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature (RCW 36.70A.110).
There are several reasons for variation in the value of this indicator across counties and jurisdictions. The relative importance of these reasons varies across the region. Below are some observations that may help interpret results and identify questions worth additional research. Due to data availability, we are not yet able to evaluate change over time and thus apply the "No Trend" designation. As we collect more information on this indicator, we will update this report to characterize its trend.
Cities with significant multi-unit housing production had less impervious surface gains per unit.
The total amount of residential development impacts performance in this indicator.
Data is not currently available to measure progress over time in this indicator. Trends over time in this indicator are essential to explore how different strategies, policies, and actions shape infill development and impervious surface area gain. This indicator will be updated as new data becomes available.
We currently lack available data to evaluate this indicator over time; this limits our ability to conceptualize specific reasons for trends over time. However, the Action Agenda describes several regional strategies to channel growth into UGAs and promote infill development. If implemented, local jurisdictions may improve their performance in this indicator.
For example, local jurisdictions can promote infill development by:
No datasets uploaded.
No Subcategories for this Puget Sound Indicator.