No targets are currently set for this indicator.
This indicator evaluates the abundance and trend of the 32 steelhead populations by measuring the number of natural-origin adult fish on the spawning grounds of three Puget Sound regions. Abundance estimates here do not include hatchery-origin fish or steelhead taken in harvest or by predators like orcas. The indicator is intended to reflect the goal of achieving wild population recovery of Puget Sound steelhead, which are federally listed as threatened.
Annual percent change in steelhead spawner abundance from 2007 (year of Endangered Species Act listing) to 2023 for 12 Puget Sound populations, shown by geographic region. Abundance data were not available at the necessary spatial scale for other Puget Sound steelhead populations. The lines show the 25th to 75th credibility intervals (CIs). CIs represent a range of values the true annual percent change likely falls within. CIs for all populations contain zero, suggesting no statistically significant change in spawner abundance from 2007 to 2023.
Steelhead are the state fish of Washington and a cultural icon of the Pacific Northwest. The current Puget Sound steelhead run is less than 5 to 10 percent of its historical size and they are listed as “Threatened” under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). Returning steelhead are highly prized by anglers and are guaranteed to be available to Indian Tribes by treaties signed with the federal government.
Steelhead spawner abundance data are collected annually by WDFW and tribal co-manager staff as part of baseline monitoring and data collection efforts.
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), Salmon Population Indicators (SPi) abundance data
Biologists typically estimate annual spawner abundance by counting the number of redds (gravel nests) in a river each year. Redds are counted by walking the stream or from boats or aircraft. In many populations, some hatchery-origin salmon are present on the spawning grounds along with natural-origin salmon, complicating the estimates of natural-origin abundance. The proportions of spawners that were of natural versus hatchery origin are typically estimated based on the composition of carcasses of each origin. These proportions are applied to the total spawning population to estimate the number of natural-origin versus hatchery-origin spawners.
Steelhead population spawner abundance is reported here as the number of natural-origin fish estimated on the spawning grounds (spawning naturally). Data were available at the necessary spatial scale for 12 of the 32 Puget Sound steelhead populations.
Our analysis of abundance change over time answers the question:
Has the spawner abundance of each steelhead population changed compared to their abundance in 2007 when Puget Sound steelhead were listed by NOAA Fisheries under the Endangered Species Act (ESA)?
We chose ESA listing in 2007 as the baseline reference period because this date denotes the start of deliberate management effort to improve the status of the population.
In this trend evaluation, we fit a multivariate autoregressive state space random walk with drift (MARSS-RWD) model to the log of population spawner abundance data for all populations from 2007 to 2023. The model structure was identical to that used by NOAA Fisheries’ Northwest Fisheries Science Center in its 5-year status review with a few exceptions (Northwest Fisheries Science Center, 2022). The slope of each population's smoothed abundance values was converted to percent change per year. If data were not available during these periods for a given population, data from the first or most recent years with available data were used.
To assess each population’s spawner abundance levels, we compared their recent 5-year geometric mean (“geomean”) of smoothed abundance data from the MARSS-RWD model to their low productivity planning target for abundance to get a percent of target abundance. Planning targets for steelhead abundance have been estimated for both low and high productivity scenarios. At low productivity, the population needs to be larger compared to that at high productivity in order to survive and be resilient to poorer habitat and environmental conditions, changes, and catastrophes. We evaluated the recent 5-year geomeans relative to the low productivity planning targets because the populations are thought to be in a low productivity phase, and it is a more conservative assessment. Find more information on steelhead planning targets for abundance and productivity in chapter 4 of the ESA Recovery Plan for the Puget Sound Steelhead Distinct Population Segment (Oncorhynchus mykiss; 2019). Please note that the planning targets for abundance were adopted by NOAA Fisheries and are distinct from recovery targets developed for Vital Sign indicators.
For more information about the methods used for this indicator, please see the Status and Trends Analysis of Salmon Abundance Data methods report.
References:
Northwest Fisheries Science Center. 2022. Biological Viability Assessment Update for Pacific Salmon and Steelhead Listed Under the Endangered Species Act: Pacific Northwest.
All Puget Sound steelhead populations are currently well below abundance levels (planning targets) needed for population recovery and reduced risk of extinction (Table 1). Population spawner abundance values fluctuate from year to year, often with no clear linear trends. To visualize the year–to-year adult abundance estimates and the data underlying our results, please consult the fish abundance information compiled by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and report in the State of the Salmon.
NOAA Fisheries is the federal agency responsible for the recovery of ESA-listed salmonid species. They report trends as part of their status reviews every 5 years. In their most recent status review (Northwest Fisheries Science Center, 2022), they analyzed available data through 2019 using a similar model employed for the time trend analysis described in the methods section above. NOAA Fisheries found that the natural-origin spawner abundance of ten steelhead populations increased, five had no trends (between 10 and 10% change), and six decreased between 2010-2014 and the 2015-2019 time periods.
Table 1. Geometric mean (geomean) of model-smoothed steelhead spawner population abundance (2019-2023) and planning targets of each Puget Sound population. |
||||||
Geographic Region |
Population Name |
2019-2023 Geomean |
Planning Target |
Geomean % of Low Prod. Planning Target* |
|
|
High Productivity |
Low Productivity |
|
||||
Hood Canal/Strait of Juan de Fuca |
East Hood Canal Tributaries** |
|
|
|
|
|
South Hood Canal Tributaries |
71 |
7,100 |
16,000 |
<1% |
|
|
Skokomish** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
West Hood Canal Tributaries** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sequim/Discovery Bay Independent Tributaries** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dungeness |
372 |
1,200 |
4,100 |
9% |
|
|
Strait of Juan de Fuca Independent Tributaries** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elwha |
1280 |
2,619 |
2,619 |
49% |
|
|
Central and South Puget Sound |
North Lake Washington and Lake Sammamish** |
|
|
|
|
|
Cedar** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Green** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puyallup/Carbon** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
White |
253 |
12,000 |
18,000 |
1% |
|
|
Nisqually |
1012 |
6,100 |
20,500 |
5% |
|
|
South Sound Tributaries** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
East Kitsap** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Cascades |
Drayton Harbor Tributaries** |
|
|
|
|
|
Nooksack |
1410 |
6,500 |
21,700 |
6% |
|
|
South Fork Nooksack** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samish and Bellingham Bay Tributaries |
729 |
1,800 |
6,100 |
12% |
|
|
Skagit |
4466 |
15,000 |
15,000 |
30% |
|
|
Nookachamps*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baker*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sauk*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stillaguamish** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deer** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canyon** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Snohomish/Skykomish |
593 |
5,200 |
20,600 |
3% |
|
|
Pilchuck |
313 |
2,500 |
8,200 |
4% |
|
|
North Fork Skykomish** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Snoqualmie |
499 |
11,400 |
13,000 |
4% |
|
|
Tolt |
53 |
1,200 |
18,000 |
<1% |
|
*(5-year geomean/low productivity planning target)*100
** Natural-origin, naturally-spawning abundance data not available at necessary spatial scale
*** Included in the Skagit population
Salmon and steelhead recovery in Puget Sound has been guided over the years by collaborative processes. The ESA Recovery Plan for the Puget Sound Steelhead was developed by regional experts and adopted by NOAA Fisheries in 2019 to meet obligations under the ESA.
Despite continued investments in restoring salmon habitat in and around streams and rivers, significantly reduced harvest rates, and revisions in hatchery management, the region is not seeing significant progress in increasing Puget Sound steelhead abundance. Steelhead utilize a variety of habitats, from freshwater to the ocean, and are therefore vulnerable to stressors associated with change and degradation of habitats across a large area. Furthermore, many of the factors already implicated in the lack of recovery of steelhead are exacerbated by the bio-physical impacts of climate change. From the Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission 2020 State of Our Watersheds Report:
"A consistent trend identified in the 2020 State of Our Watersheds Report is that key habitat features, such as riparian vegetation, habitat connectivity and streamflows, continue to be imperiled by human activities. This extensive loss and degradation of habitat, changing climate and ocean conditions threaten salmon, tribal cultures and tribal treaty-reserved rights, wildlife habitat, water quality and western Washington’s economy and quality of life."
The Salish Sea Marine Survival Project seeks to address the critical question: What are the causes of salmon and steelhead decline in the Salish Sea? The Project identified two primary drivers behind declining juvenile salmon survival in the Salish Sea: changes in food supply and increase in predators. Please refer to the Project webpage for more information on the research to assess salmon condition and survival.
Salmon Vital Sign Indicator Reporting Plan
Recreation and Conservation Office's State of Salmon in Watersheds Report and Salmon Abundance Dashboard
Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission State of Our Watersheds Report
ESA Recovery Plan for the Puget Sound Steelhead Distinct Population Segment
No datasets uploaded.
No Subcategories for this Puget Sound Indicator.