QA Environment
Basics
Healthy Human Population
Air Quality
Indicator
Exposure to impaired air quality
Vital Sign Indicator
Percent (%)
/

No targets are currently set for this indicator.

Jill Schulte
Contributing Partners
Last Updated
04/04/2025 16:42:11
Map
Washington's healthy air goal status by Puget Sound county in 2023. Each county is represented by the highest 98th percentile PM2.5 concentration at any monitoring site in that county. Counties not meeting the healthy air goal have impaired air quality for at least eight days out of the year.
Description

Particle pollution, also called particulate matter (PM), is a mixture of tiny solids or liquid droplets that includes smoke, soot, dirt, and dust floating in the air. PM2.5 (particles less than 2.5 micrometers) is identified as a pollution problem in many Washington communities and is associated with a number of adverse health impacts. This indicator tracks the percent of the Puget Sound population exposed to air quality that does not meet the state healthy air goal for PM2.5 (20 µg/m3).

Vital Sign Indicator Chart
Exposure to impaired air quality
 

Percentage of the Puget Sound population exposed to air quality that does not meet Ecology’s healthy air goal for fine particulate matter (PM2.5) of 20 µg/m3.

Exposure to PM2.5 pollution causes a number of adverse health impacts, particularly to the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems. Its impacts are especially harmful for those with chronic heart and lung diseases such as asthma, bronchitis, and emphysema. PM2.5 exposure can exacerbate these conditions, which can lead to hospitalization or premature mortality. Sensitive populations, such as children and the elderly, also face greater risks of health impacts from PM2.5 exposure. 

Key Vital Sign Indicator Results
  • In summer 2023, western Washington experienced brief and moderate periods of wildfire smoke. Wildfire smoke conditions were not severe enough to cause the year's 98th percentile PM2.5 concentrations in any county to exceed Washington's healthy air goal of 20 μg/m3 based on summer concentrations alone. Three counties exceeded the healthy air goal in 2023: King, Pierce, and Snohomish. In all three counties, elevated concentrations were driven by a combination of moderate wildfire smoke impacts in summer and smoke from residential wood combustion during wintertime stagnation events. As King County comprises approximately 43% of the total population of the Puget Sound counties, the indicator results in 2023 are primarily driven by the inclusion of King County as an impacted county. However, only three of King County's nine monitoring sites exceeded the healthy air goal.

 

  • In 2022, smoke from several fires in Washington’s Cascade Range caused intermittent periods of impaired air quality across the state, with an unusually late and severe smoke episode in western Washington in October. PM2.5 monitors in Clallam, King, Mason, Pierce, Skagit, Snohomish, and Whatcom counties recorded 98th percentile concentrations above the Washington healthy air goal of 20 μg/m3. All monitors representing Island, Jefferson, Kitsap, San Juan, and Thurston counties met the healthy air goal.

 

  • In 2021, western Washington experienced a relatively mild wildfire smoke season with only a few summer days with smoke impacts at most monitoring sites. Only three Puget Sound communities recorded a 98th percentile PM2.5 concentration over Washington's healthy air goal of 20 μg/m3: Darrington, Marysville, and South Tacoma. Exceedances of Washington's health air goal were primarily observed during brief episodes of cold and stagnant weather in the winter months. During such conditions, residential wood combustion is a leading source of PM2.5 in these communities.

 

  • In 2020, greater than 99% of the Puget Sound population was exposed to impaired air quality. An extensive and severe wildfire smoke episode in late summer caused unhealthy air quality across the state, with many areas reaching the very unhealthy and hazardous ranges of PM2.5 for several days. All but one monitoring site in the Puget Sound watershed (Neah Bay) recorded 98th percentile PM2.5 concentrations above Washington's healthy air goal of 20 μg/m3. During this smoke event, many monitoring sites set records for their highest concentrations ever recorded. Outside of the wildfire season, PM2.5 concentrations were relatively low.

 

  • After two consecutive years of prolonged wildfire smoke impacts in 2017 and 2018, calendar year 2019 was marked by a mild wildfire season with very few smoke-impacted days. The exceedances of Washington's healthy air goal of 20 μg/m3 were primarily observed during brief episodes of cold and stagnant weather in the winter months. These episodes occurred with moderate frequency relative to other years. Residential wood combustion is a dominant source of PM2.5 during cold, stagnant weather.

 

  • In 2017 and 2018, smoke from local and regional wildland fires caused impaired air quality across western Washington for several weeks. The wildfire smoke incidents were so extensive and prolonged that they caused PM2.5 concentrations to rise above Washington's healthy air goal of 20 μg/m3 for an extended period at most monitoring sites in the Puget Sound region. Consequently, the majority of Puget Sound residents were exposed to air quality that did not meet the state's healthy air goal for PM2.5 in both years.
Methods
Monitoring Program

Washington State Department of Ecology Ambient Air Monitoring Network 

Data Source

Washington State Department of Ecology Ambient Air Monitoring Network

Washington Office of Financial Management April 1 Population Estimates

Test

PM2.5 concentrations are measured continuously at monitoring sites throughout the Puget Sound region by three local clean air agencies (the Northwest Clean Air Agency, Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, Olympic Region Clean Air Agency), the Washington Department of Ecology, and Tribal nations. Each site reports a daily average PM2.5 concentration that the surrounding population may be exposed to. Every year, 98th percentile daily concentrations are calculated for each active monitoring site following the process described in 40 C.F.R. Part 50 Appendix N. This metric is the basis of the 24-hour National Ambient Air Quality Standard for PM2.5. The 'exposure to impaired air quality' indicator shows where the 98th percentile of the daily average PM2.5 measurements exceed Washington’s healthy air goal for PM2.5 (20 µg/m3) for a particular year. The 98th percentile is the 8th highest day in a year with complete data, therefore, areas not meeting the healthy air goal have impaired air quality for at least eight days out of the year.

Each of the twelve counties adjoining Puget Sound (Clallam, Island, Jefferson, King, Kitsap, Mason, Pierce, San Juan, Skagit, Snohomish, Thurston, and Whatcom) is assigned the highest 98th percentile PM2.5 concentration of the monitoring sites in that county. This approach is consistent with EPA's treatment of summary PM2.5 data by county where multiple monitoring sites exist in one county (see EPA's Air Quality Design Values). San Juan County, which has no monitoring sites, is assigned the 98th percentile PM2.5 concentration from the Anacortes-O Ave monitor, as a 2019 PM2.5 study by the Department of Ecology indicated that this Anacortes monitor is adequately representative of air quality conditions in San Juan County. 

Annual populations for each county are obtained from the Washington Office of Financial Management's April 1 Population Estimates. The percent of the Puget Sound population exposed to air quality that does not meet the state healthy air goal for PM2.5 (20 µg/m3) is calculated as the population of Puget Sound counties with 98th percentile PM2.5 concentrations over 20 µg/m3 divided by the total population of the twelve Puget Sound counties. 

Critical Definitions

PM2.5 refers to fine particulate matter smaller than 2.5 micrometers in aerodynamic diameter. 

Daily values refer to the 24-hour average concentrations of PM2.5  measured from midnight to midnight from suitable monitors.

98th percentile is the 8th highest daily value in a year with complete monitoring data.

Interpretation of Results

Future work on this indicator will attempt to develop a complementary measure of air quality that examines trends among environmental justice communities and/or tribal reservations. Identifying whether specific demographic groups are more exposed to poor air quality than others will help provide a more complete understanding of environmental and public health issues experienced across Puget Sound.

Test

PM2.5 concentrations fluctuate year-to-year based on changes in meteorology and emissions. The severity of local and regional wildfires has been a key driver of changes in PM2.5 concentrations in recent years. Outside of wildfire smoke events, air quality is generally improving over time. Successful interventions such as wood stove replacements have lead to reduced PM2.5 concentrations in many communities most impacted by smoke from residential wood combustion. However, when summarizing PM2.5 conditions annually, such progress is masked by the increasing frequency and severity of wildfire smoke events. 

Test

The Washington Department of Ecology conducts a number of programs to reduce particle pollution in Washington

For more information about air quality monitoring in Washington, see the Department of Ecology's Air Quality Monitoring Network webpage and map of current air quality conditions

EPA's AirNow Fire and Smoke map displays agency PM2.5 air monitoring data along with publicly available air sensor data calibrated using a national correction equation.

Department of Ecology (2009) Health Effects and Economic Impacts of Fine Particle Pollution in Washington

Datasets

The Puget Sound Partnership believes in the transparency and accessibility of the data used to address puget sound indicators. These data are provided by contributing partners to the Partnership and are made publicly available through the Puget Sound Info site. These data are available on an "as is" basis and the Partnership is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies. Please acknowledge the monitoring program and data source when using these data and obtain permission from the Vital Sign Indicator Reporter to use these data in a publication.

Awesome dataset
Uploaded On
04/04/2025
File Type
Excel (XLSX)
Description
This data set has it ALL!
Reporting Guidance
Reporting Instructions
Subcategories

No Subcategories for this Puget Sound Indicator.